Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans

Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans

  • March 18, 2018
Table of Contents

Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans

This study compares the accuracy of personality judgment—a ubiquitous and important social-cognitive activity—between computer models and humans. Using several criteria, we show that computers’ judgments of people’s personalities based on their digital footprints are more accurate and valid than judgments made by their close others or acquaintances (friends, family, spouse, colleagues, etc.). Our findings highlight that people’s personalities can be predicted automatically and without involving human social-cognitive skills.

Source: pnas.org

Tags :
Share :
comments powered by Disqus

Related Posts

Reptile: A Scalable Meta-Learning Algorithm

Reptile: A Scalable Meta-Learning Algorithm

We’ve developed a simple meta-learning algorithm called Reptile which works by repeatedly sampling a task, performing stochastic gradient descent on it, and updating the initial parameters towards the final parameters learned on that task. This method performs as well as MAML, a broadly applicable meta-learning algorithm, while being simpler to implement and more computationally efficient.

Read More
Researchers Can ‘See’ Your Memories While You Sleep

Researchers Can ‘See’ Your Memories While You Sleep

New research published today by Cairney and his colleagues in Current Biology has made significant headway on this issue by linking sleep spindles—spontaneous bursts of brain activity—to memory processing in a sleeping brain. Incredibly, the researchers claim it is possible to determine the content of the memory being processed by analyzing this brain activity.

Read More