Training a neural network in phase-change memory beats GPUs

Training a neural network in phase-change memory beats GPUs

  • June 8, 2018
Table of Contents

Training a neural network in phase-change memory beats GPUs

Compared to a typical CPU, a brain is remarkably energy-efficient, in part because it combines memory, communications, and processing in a single execution unit, the neuron. A brain also has lots of them, which lets it handle lots of tasks in parallel. Attempts to run neural networks on traditional CPUs run up against these fundamental mismatches.

Only a few things can be executed at a time, and shuffling data to memory is a slow process. As a result, neural networks have tended to be both computationally and energy intensive. A few years back, IBM announced a new processor design that was a bit closer to a collection of neurons and could execute neural networks far more efficiently.

But this didn’t help much with training the networks in the first place. Now, IBM is back with a hardware design that’s specialized for training neural networks. And it does this in part by directly executing the training in a specialized type of memory.

Phase-change memory is based on materials that can form two different structures, or phases, depending on how quickly they cool from a liquid. As the conductance of these phases differ, it’s possible to use this to store bits. It’s also possible to control the temperature such that the bit enters a state with intermediate conductance.

In addition to storing bits, this can be used to perform calculations, as a bunch of sub-threshold phase changes can gradually add up to a bit flip.

Source: arstechnica.com

Tags :
Share :
comments powered by Disqus

Related Posts

Horovod: Distributed Training Framework for TensorFlow, Keras, and PyTorch

Horovod: Distributed Training Framework for TensorFlow, Keras, and PyTorch

Horovod is a distributed training framework for TensorFlow, Keras, and PyTorch. The goal of Horovod is to make distributed Deep Learning fast and easy to use.

Read More
Americans Less Trusting of Self-Driving Safety Following High-Profile Accidents

Americans Less Trusting of Self-Driving Safety Following High-Profile Accidents

Americans are less trusting of self-driving cars following two deadly accidents involving autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles, with half of U.S. adults considering those automobiles less safe than human drivers, according to a new poll. A Morning Consult survey conducted March 29-April 1 among a national sample of 2,202 adults found that 27 percent of respondents said self-driving cars are safer than human drivers, while 50 percent said autonomous vehicles are less safe. Eight percent said the automobiles are on par with human drivers when it comes to safety.

Read More