Sidestepping Dependency Ordering with AppSwitch

Sidestepping Dependency Ordering with AppSwitch

  • January 23, 2019
Table of Contents

Sidestepping Dependency Ordering with AppSwitch

We are going through an interesting cycle of application decomposition and recomposition. While the microservice paradigm is driving monolithic applications to be broken into separate individual services, the service mesh approach is helping them to be connected back together into well-structured applications. As such, microservices are logically separate but not independent.

They are usually closely interdependent and taking them apart introduces many new concerns such as need for mutual authentication between services. Istio directly addresses most of those issues. An issue that arises due to application decomposition and one that Istio doesn’t address is dependency ordering – bringing up individual services of an application in an order that guarantees that the application as a whole comes up quickly and correctly.

In a monolithic application, with all its components built-in, dependency ordering between the components is enforced by internal locking mechanisms. But with individual services potentially scattered across the cluster in a service mesh, starting a service first requires checking that the services it depends on are up and available.

Source: istio.io

Share :
comments powered by Disqus

Related Posts

Rate Limiting at the Edge

Rate Limiting at the Edge

I’m sure many of you have heard of the “Death Star Security” model—the hardening of the perimeter, without much attention paid to the inner core—and while this is generally considered bad form in the current cloud native landscape, there is still many things that do need to be implemented at edge in order to provide both operational and business logic support. One of these things is rate limiting. Modern applications and APIs can experience a burst of traffic over a short time period, for both good and bad reasons, but this needs to be managed well if your business model relies upon the successful completion of requests by paying customers.

Read More
A Crash Course For Running Istio

A Crash Course For Running Istio

At Namely we’ve been running with Istio for a year now. Yes, that’s pretty much when it first came out. We had a major performance regression with a Kubernetes cluster, we wanted distributed tracing, and used Istio to bootstrap Jaeger to investigate.

Read More
Combining Federation V2 and Istio Multicluster

Combining Federation V2 and Istio Multicluster

In a previous post, we saw how to leverage Istio Multicluster to deploy an application (bookinfo) on multiple Red Hat OpenShift clusters and apply mesh policies on all of the deployed services. We also saw that the deployment process was relatively complex. In this post we are going to see how Federation V2 can help simplify the process of deploying an application to multiple clusters.

Read More